Considering the negative audience reception for one underwhelmingBeetlejuice 2moment, I’m convinced thatBeetlejuice 3needs to break a beloved franchise tradition. The campy Tim Burton movieBeetlejuicebecame a cult classic after its 1988 release, developing a passionate fan base. 36 years later, the filmBeetlejuice Beetlejuicehit theaters. Less than half a year afterthe 2024 sequel’s $451 million success, Warner Bros announced that the Ghost With The Most would appear again inBeetlejuice 3.

As a massive fan of the firstBeetlejuicemovie, my feelings about the threequel are mostly those of excitement, with a dash of nervousness. I couldn’t wait to watchBeetlejuice Beetlejuice,and it lived up to expectations in many ways. However, it did have one big issue that could impact the upcoming third movie.Beetlejuice 2continued the franchise tradition of including a campy musical number, which should have been great fun. Sadly, the scene was so disappointing that I’m convinced theofficially confirmedBeetlejuice 3would be better off skipping a lip-syncing scene altogether.

Michael Keaton and Winona Ryder in Beetlejuice Beetlejuice

Beetlejuice 2’s MacArthur Park Scene Felt Forced & Lasted Too Long

Beetlejuice 2’s Musical Number Desperately Needed Editing

Beetlejuice’s “Day-O” scene is iconic, andBeetlejuice Beetlejuicetries to replicate the magic. Disappointingly,Beetlejuice 2’s MacArthur Park scene didn’t live up to expectations. Whencomparing “Day-O” to “MacArthur Park,”the first felt completely authentic to the scene while the latter didn’t. Adam and Barbara possessing people and making them dance seems like the way they would try to scare a dinner party. However, Betelgeuse breaking out into song at his wedding felt forced, and that’s partly because it was.

According to screenwriter Alfred Gough, they set out to do a musical number like “Day-O” from the start, rather than the scene happening organically (viaThe Hollywood Reporter). The “MacArthur Park” number could still have worked, despite being forced, if they had shown some restraint when it came to the scene. Unfortunately,they decided to include the entire 7-minute and 21-second-long song. By comparison, the Day-O musical number lasts just under 2 minutes inBeetlejuice.

Winona Ryder as Lydia Deetz in Beetlejuice Beetlejuice

Each additional underwhelming lip-syncing scene has the potential to water down the impact of the musical numbers as a whole.

The fever dream-ish chaos in the“MacArthur Park” dance and lipsync sceneis fun at first. The song includes changing time signatures and odd lyrics that feel appropriate forBeetlejuice Beetlejuice. However,the musical number dragged on for so long that it lost every bit of charm and enjoyment. By the end, I was frustrated. I just wanted the musical number to be done because it was distracting from the story instead of enhancing it. Because bothBeetlejuiceandBeetlejuice Beetlejuiceinclude a big musical number, the expectation is thatBeetlejuice 3will continue the tradition.

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Film Poster

A Lackluster Musical Scene Could Ruin Beetlejuice 3

Fans Could Hold A Grudge Against Beetlejuice 3 If They Deliver Another Subpar Musical Number

Even though musical scenes have become a tradition of theBeetlejuicefranchise, I’m concerned that a lackluster lip-syncing scene could ruinBeetlejuice 3for many fans, even if the rest of the movie is decent. I wasn’t the only one who felt let down by the musical number inBeetlejuice Beetlejuice.The “MacArthur Park” scene was frequently mentioned as a negative of the movie in reviewsfrom both critics and audience members.

Fans probably won’t forget the last let down so easily, which meansthe third attempt at a musical scene could be a make-or-break moment. Unfortunately, each additional underwhelming lip-syncing scene has the potential to water down the impact of the musical numbers as a whole. The more times they include characters lip-syncing to songs, the higher the risk. IfBeetlejuice 3messes up, that would be two movies in a row. I know I’d certainly begrudge them for not paying proper homage one of the most memorable moments of the originalBeetlejuice, and I don’t think I’m the only one.

Beetlejuice 3 Should Probably Skip The Musical Number

Skipping The Musical Number in Beetlejuice 3 Would Be A Daring But Smart Choice

Although I love a good musical scene, especially a bizarre one, I thinkBeetlejuice 3would probably be better off skipping it. At this point, they’ve already caught lightning in a bottle once by creating the “Day-O” scene. The second film wasn’t very successful at replicating that feeling despite the creative team putting in a lot of effort. The team behindBeetlejuice 3might just want to cut their losses rather than strive to achieve a nearly impossible task.It’s better not to include a musical number at all than to include a disappointing onethat will leave fans upset.

That being said,if the creative team does decide to include one in the third film, they need to be very strategic. The musical number needs to truly fit within the scene, rather than feeling forced. The maximum length the song should be is 4 minutes, twice the length of the “Day-O” number, to prevent theBeetlejuice 3scene from dragging on. I would also advise them to think about why they want a musical number in the movie. They also need a good reason to include it inBeetlejuice 3rather than just saying “it’s tradition” or “fans expect it.”